Sales Repository Logo
ONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKSONLY FOR SALES GEEKS

Competitive Negotiation

What is Competitive Negotiation?

Competitive Negotiation is a strategy where parties compete to claim maximum value, often used in one-time transactions with limited resources. This approach views negotiation as a contest where one party's gain typically comes at the expense of the other, focusing on distributing rather than creating value.

Key Principles

  • Focus on claiming value rather than creating it
  • Use of strategic information control and tactical maneuvers
  • Emphasis on positions rather than interests
  • Leverage power differentials when possible
  • Aim for outcomes that favor your side

When to Use Competitive Negotiation

This strategy is particularly effective in situations where:

  • Resources are truly limited (zero-sum situations)
  • The relationship is not expected to continue
  • Time constraints prevent more collaborative approaches
  • The other party is using competitive tactics
  • The stakes are high and compromise is not viable

Implementation Steps

  1. Set ambitious targets: Start with high demands to create room for concessions
  2. Control information: Share selectively to maintain advantage
  3. Identify leverage points: Find areas where you have power or the other party has vulnerability
  4. Use strategic concessions: Make small, calculated concessions to create reciprocity
  5. Apply pressure tactics: Use deadlines, competition, or other forms of pressure
  6. Maintain a strong BATNA: Be prepared to walk away if terms are unfavorable

Advantages and Limitations

Advantages:

  • Can produce favorable short-term outcomes
  • Effective in truly zero-sum situations
  • Protects against exploitation by competitive counterparts
  • Often requires less time than collaborative approaches

Limitations:

  • Damages relationships and trust
  • May lead to impasse or no agreement
  • Misses opportunities for value creation
  • Can escalate into destructive conflict
  • May result in implementation problems due to resentment